http://eu.blizzard.com/diablo3/chara...itchdoctor.xml
|||Now it is on the US site too... and it's on the news too...I'll have to admit that she's the best designed character so far...I truly like her design...
If I ever use a WD it will surely be a female one now...
Blizz could add such facepaint to the male one... it could look freaky and interesting... (funnily enough tho... the WD will most likely be using a mask most of the time, so... ehrm)
nevertheless the male Monk is still my favorite char...|||I think WD will be my first char, and because the fem model is so much better then the male, I might even play a fem WD first.
Good work Blizzard, maybe a bit too much feathers around her but oh well.
Wirt|||The male WD was love at first sight for me - I still prefer him :].
That's not to say that the female WD doesn't look good, I just usually gravitate towards whatever gender I saw any class first revealed as.|||Female looks much better than the male. The fur, face-paint and overall color scheme definitely make her more impressive than the male version. I wonder if this is a case of art evolving during development and if the male will also get an art upgrade.|||my first thought was "thunder thighs." maybe it's just my monitor, but the leggings around her hips just look like more . . .hip.|||I like the look. And yes, agree that it's an upgrade over the fairly plain male WD. Perhaps he'll get an upgrade as well, with some added ornamentation and/or war paint.
Just posted a main page vote on the female wd's look, so we'll see if the general opinion matches the largely favorable comments thus far made about her.|||I think that plain male look Flux is like Wiz male to female comparison, male WD and fem Wiz, are in their light/unarmored look, and counterparts are fairly armored.|||she scares me
|||I'm glad they actually gave her clothes, and didn't make her look like a sex-beast like most females in most games.
No comments:
Post a Comment